Such submissions violate our dual submission policy and will be removed from submission. Videos will be manually reviewed before being posted to Hopin; videos without adequate captions or that present other serious accessibility concerns will be returned for revision. There are three main exceptions to this rule: Please contact email@example.com for any KDD 2022 (acceptance rate: 14.99%) L. Zheng, J. Xiong, Y. Zhu, and J. FAccT'22 has the same acceptance rate of previous editions but the most accepted papers so far - we received almost double the submissions of 2021, and have accepted double the number of papers (181 in total). It will help the Area Chairs and Program Chairs decide whether to accept the submissions. for other questions/comments, firstname.lastname@example.org. The PC chairs consider this to be an integral part of the reviewing process and a foundational step in creating and constructing impactful interdisciplinary work. deadlines are at 11:59 PM Anywhere On Earth on the given date. It requires various forms of discretionary work to translate high-level objectives or strategic goals into tractable problems, necessitating, among other things, the identification Quantitative definitions of what is unfair and what is fair have been introduced in multiple disciplines for well over 50 years, including in education, hiring, and machine learning. consider dimensions beyond individual decisions, including equity Your comments should be detailed, specific, and polite. Furthermore, reviewers will disclosure of audits. Submissions that have "placeholder" titles and abstracts (e.g., "TBA") or none at all at the abstract submission deadline may be deleted. previously appeared in non-archival venues such as workshops without We strongly recommend that authors also read it to familiarize themselves with the reviewing process. Contact the Program Co-chairs: email@example.com. In this setting the decision-maker's fairness policy governs the number of With rapid progress in artificial intelligence (AI), popularity of generative art has grown substantially. The Review of Economic Studies, 68(1):205--229, 2001. In keeping with our roots in computing, we appreciate both systems workshop papers: ACM FAccT welcomes submission of work that has 9%! Keep in mind that reviewers are not obligated to read the appendix or supplementary materials. . Area chairs will be listed on the FAccT website prior to the paper submission deadline. Papers got accepted to ACM CCS, IEEE ICC, IEEE CNS, IEEE Milcom, and. field address the problems and opportunities of intersectional network information), must follow basic precepts of ethical research and FAT* '19: Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAT* '19: Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Chicago , Papers all submissions will have the same page length requirements and will be (Acceptance rate: 24%) [C3] Charles Marx*, Richard Phillips*, Sorelle A. Friedler, Carlos Scheidegger, and Suresh Venkatasub-ramanian. concerns in paper reviews, authors will have an opportunity to the concerns of ACM FAccT? decisions are made. Settings such as lending and policing can be modeled by a centralized agent allocating a scarce resource (e.g. Note that submitting usability and accessibility as well as support the longevity of ACM social justice in relation to design of computational systems? We have assessed travel intentions from most of our authors, and (depending on funding) up to 55% intend to travel to Seoul. If necessary, this can be escalated to the PC chairs. #FAccT2023 As of May 9, about 65% of registrations include in-person attendance. Contrastive Learning with Complex Heterogeneity. This will allow us to find an alternate reviewer who will be better able to assess the submission. For example, if College A has 100,000 applicants and accepts 5,000 students, their acceptance rate is 5%. The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. (September 2022) ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (ACM FAccT, formerly known as ACM FAT*) is a peer-reviewed academic conference series about ethics and computing systems. If so, one cross-disciplinary reviewer will be asked to review in a 14 working day time-frame as set out above. Additionally, please indicate if, in your opinion, this prevented your review from being impartial. The Track Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale. Recently, social media sites like Facebook and Twitter have been severely criticized by policy makers, and media watchdog groups for allowing fake news stories to spread unchecked on their platforms. In your response, please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. Please avoid vague, subjective complaints, and make specific suggestions for improving the work where applicable. Take your job seriously and be fair. Those who do not pre-register IL , We welcome submissions in the following areas: We especially welcome contributions that incorporate perspectives and investigations on FAccT that are relevant to or grounded in the cultures, norms, laws, and/or sociopolitical systems from regions that are usually not featured prominently at FAccT, which has so far been composed mainly of North American and European scholarship. These works may be submitted as-is or in an extended The Overall Score for each submission should reflect your assessment of the submissions contributions. beneficence (maximizing the benefits to an individual or to society while minimizing harm to the individual), risk mitigation, and post-hoc submission. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. under review at a journal, but which have not yet been published in that You may not submit papers that are identical, or substantially similar to versions that are currently under review at another conference, have been previously published, or have been accepted for publication. Automated systems for detecting harmful social media content are afflicted by a variety of biases, some of which originate in their training datasets. Final submissions will be due on January 21, 2022. Your video must have *embedded* captions (see next section). ACM Journal of Experimental Algorithmics, 24.1 (2019): 1-10. . welcome scholarship in dialogue with fairness, accountability, and What kinds of marginalization are relevant to If you have further questions about video format, please direct them to firstname.lastname@example.org. opens. You should NOT assume that you were assigned a representative sample of submissions, nor should you adjust your scores to match the overall conference acceptance rates. Area chairs will oversee the reviewing process. Authors will upload videos to their preferred cloud drive service and share publicly accessible links for each video with the conference organizers. Area Chairs should return their meta-reviews by April 5 11:59 pm AoE. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '22, pages 1240-1256, New York, NY, USA, June 2022. Peer-reviewing and cross-disciplinary reviewing should be centered around the following objectives. In Proceed- on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT ings of the Fourteenth Workshop on Semantic Evalua- '21, page 610-623, New York, NY, USA. sufficient. Strong work makes a contribution that his important to the FAccT academic field. In a very limited number of cases where an otherwise excellent paper requires a significant but actionable revision, Program Chairs can select such submissions for shepherding. from a wide variety of disciplines, including computer science, Recent research has successfully employed social media data to predict mental health states of individuals, A single algorithm drives an important health care decision for over 70 million people in the US. This dichotomy undermines efforts to make algorithmic systems more fair, transparent, and accountable. Trust is needed for facilitating collaboration between scientists who may share datasets and Representativeness is a foundational yet slippery concept. will appear in the published proceedings of the conference, if they are The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. relevant domains inform a broad perspective on how to frame and advance Please provide an Overall Score for each submission. proceedings. It is an opportunity to advertise your research in an easily-shared and easily-consumed format, to increase the chance that people will engage with it more deeply. register for, (virtually) attend, and present the work at the conference Archival papers If you have a question about a specific submission or evaluation criteria for a track, your primary point of contact should be the relevant Track Chairs, who you can contact through Confidential Comments to Track Chairs and PC Chairs text field. Please make your review as detailed and informative as possible; short, superficial reviews that venture uninformed opinions or guesses are worse than no review since they may result in the rejection of a high-quality submission. Please note that in contrast to The objectives of the reviewing process are: The first objective ensures that ACM FAT* is considered a top tier venue for the discussion of fairness, accountability, and transparency of algorithmic systems. Author responses: After receiving reviews, authors will have a brief period to offer responses to the reviews. scholarship. The author responses are intended to allow the authors to concisely identify perceived mistakes of fact or reasoning in the reviews that foundationally affect the assessment about their work. ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency 2022 (ACM FAccT 2023) Call For Papers. These tests are often run on their websites without explicit consent from users. ACM FAccT uses a mutually anonymous review process. FAccT* also welcomes full paper submissions that extend previously published short papers or abstracts, even if they appeared in formal proceedings, if the previously published version does not exceed 4 pages in length. Our research community is multidisciplinary in its make-up and orientation. Algorithmic oppression is then situated through a Black feminist lens part of which entails highlighting the double bind of technology. The Fourth Workshop on Responsible Recommendation (FAccTRec 2021) was held in conjunction with the 15th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems on September, 2021 at Amsterdam, Netherlands, in a hybrid format. In your response, Please address the degree to which the following statements apply to this work. previous years.) transparency in computational systems, including critical approaches Stylistic Authorship Attribution of Small, Incomplete Source Code Fragments Edwin Dauber,Aylin Caliskan, Richard Harang, Gregory Shearer, Michael Weisman, Frederica Nelson, and Rachel Greenstadt 19th Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium(PETS), 2019. Copyright 2023 ACM, Inc. FAccT '21: Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT '21: 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, Chicago , The Area Chairs and Program Chairs will interpret these scores via the following scale: Note: If you feel that your confidence rating is likely to be a 1 at the end of a review due to your lack of expertise in the given subject area, you should notify the Area Chair as early as possible in the process. How should the maintained. This document is addressed at program chairs, track chairs, and program committee members. For questions regarding registration, contact email@example.com. Algorithmic systems are being adopted in a growing number of contexts, fueled by big data. Recent work has revealed that major automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems such as Apple, Amazon, Google, IBM, and Microsoft perform much more poorly for Black U.S. speakers than for white U.S. speakers. For announcements, follow @facctconference on Twitter and join our mailing list facct-announce. This topic has received extensive attention We study the problem of learning fair prediction models for unseen test sets distributed differently from the train set. When appropriate, authors are encouraged to The submission is clearly written and well organized. How can perspectives and tools from FAccT papers naturally differ in style and focus from the work featured at other venues. compare the submission to other submissions. formal proceedings. It is calculated by dividing the number of accepted students by the number of total applicants. from submissions, and avoid obvious identifying statements. This typically corresponds to about 8,000 words for the main There are lots of free options available, here are just a few suggestions: Please try to make your presentation accessible for all. A variety of programs are available to embed captions into your videos. Papers may also be formatted simply in two-column If this happens, please do not divulge the identities to anyone, but do tell the Track Chair that this has happened and make a note of this in the Confidential Comments to Program Chairs text field when you submit your review.